Articles for deletion/Nodezilla |
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article s talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus, so kept. 21:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
==Nodezilla==
Misleading about being open source; innovative - not established; not linked from elsewhere 12:10, 25 August 2005 (UTC)The network layer is the C++ bit that is not open sourced. I have been in contact with the author of Nodezilla, who seems genuine enough, and tells me that this is, indeed, a one-man, non-commercial effort and that he intends to open the network code once it stabilises. He says he didn t put the Wikipedia entry in himself. However, the reasons for deletion still stand as listed above. 12:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC))
*Delete. Not (yet) notable. -- 12:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC) *Delete Wikipedia is not a software catalog 18:23, 25 August 2005 (UTC) *Neutral I rarely (ever) vote to remove something but I am seriously disturbed about this article since after going to the webpage listed there are inconsistencies that GraemeL has suggested above: :*The download area does not have a link to the code even though the article says it s GPL [http://www.nodezilla.net/dl.html] :*The sourceforge link is to a project called Evl (but says Nodezilla as a title). :*The version of Nodezilla is 0.41 for download, but Evl is 0.6.0-23052005, are they the same or are they not :I don t think it should be deleted *if* it is accurate as there is room enough on Wikipedia for this project to have an article. -- 08:45, 29 August 2005 (UTC) *Comment I don t think room enough is a reason to keep it, according to Wikipedia guidelines! 12:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC) *Keep-ish Having said that, I am swayed by the keep comment below and by my inability to find non notability in the Wikipedia guidelines for non-inclusion!! 08:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
|
|