Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 23 |
= April 23 =
rename. -- 15:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
To conform with 22:44, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC) *Support move for stated reasons. 01:37, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
delete. -- 15:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
Apparently a beardy weirdy is a person who usually has a long, bushy 21:48, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete. Let s avoid insulting peoples grooming styles on Wikipedia ... -- 21:54, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Weak keep. I am the author of this category and I did not mean it as an insult. OTOH, if the category is deleted, then the 07:54, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete -- everything to do with Beardy weirdies. Nonsense. - 11:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete. Nonsense. 14:03, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete. JIP: Of course we d remove the category links — I mean, we do that with every category we delete, don t we Unless you mean you link directly to the category with internal links. 01:27, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) **No, I only meant the category links. I was just checking. 05:01, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Comment: Because of the implied insult, I have already emptied this category. -- 07:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
no consensus (keep). -- 15:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
Merge with 20:40, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Comment from creator: Please keep separate. I set up this category specifically as a working tool for the 1.0 effort - it s not part of the Editorial Validation project. Note that it s subcatted in 18:06, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
no consensus (keep). -- 15:32, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
Deprecated by because #the name should be plural, since it will mostly link to independant institutions #There is absolutely no need to keep quebec in the category name, since the institution is unique to Quebec. All articles have been moved. 19:42, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC) *Keep. I think Quebec CEGEP is more descriptive than CEGEPs. -- 03:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
no consensus (keep). -- 14:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
16:14, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Rename to 20:38, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Keep. This is the most familiar name for these systems. 01:29, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
delete. -- 14:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== ==
Likely to remain empty. Highest point in the Netherlands is the 14:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Strong delete, possible BJAODN as there are no mountains in the Netherlands (trust me, I live there and it s flatter than a tabletop. Even if it s a thousand-feet table top). 09:11, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC) *Delete. The 03:37, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
==Several unneccessary stub categories==
delete. -- 14:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
An appalling piece of hypercategorisation. there isn t even a Shahnama category, and the subject is quite adequately covered by other stubs. Not created nor wanted by WP:WSS. Template is currently on tfd. 11:46, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete 16:35, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
delete. -- 14:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
Created by an anonymous user. Desperately vague, it could cover everything from Yale locks to Spy satellites. Not created nor wanted by WP:WSS. Template is currently on tfd. 11:46, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete 16:35, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
delete. -- 14:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
Completely useless. Currently has three items in it including the template (which is on tfd). The entire 01:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Keep I don t see the point of this nomination, as this is a completely harmless facility. I don t see that there is any such thing as a viable level 03:01, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete, stub categories are only useful if they have a large amount of articles to them. See Wikiproject Stub Sorting. 09:12, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC) *Delete 16:35, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC) *Delete for reasons listed above. 03:39, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)|
|
