php-deluxe.net - description Categories for deletion Log 2005 April 8

Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 8

=April 8=

delete. -- 17:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== ==

Voting results:

Delete (2): Instandnood, Radiant

Consensus is to delete.

This category currently has only 1 article - 20:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) *Comment Why pick on angles Since the 23:59, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Delete, categories with this few entries are pointless; should be obviated by the more generic category SI derived units . Plus, we don t even need articles on - I d be in favor of merging the lot of those. 09:25, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

keep. -- 17:41, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== ==

Voting results:

Rename (1): Irate

Keep (1): JuntungWu

No consensus. Default is to keep.

Should be renamed to 10:17, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC) ::note: I have just moved this from 18:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *abstain - Merseyside is also the name of a former county, in is consistent with them, but on is the normal useage for -side areas (e.g. Tyneside, Deeside, etc). 18:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Keep as it is because of the former county argument. 14:57, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

keep. Categories were not nominated in good faith. -- 17:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

==Hong Kong-related categories with only one article==

:Contains only one article-- 17:27, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

*Comment (non-vote): Wikipedia is a working in progress, and these categories are getting populated. — 17:57, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) **Comment. Agreed. So you might do well not using this page as a place to play your games. I do not appreciate your delibrate attempt in picking only on under populated Singapore-related categories.-- 18:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) ***I am not playing any game. — 19:19, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) ****Actions speaks louder then words. You can be sure I will be noting this habit of yours.-- 19:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *****With respect, you re both playing games, and it s not helping to write an encyclopedia. Perhaps we can try to work out your differences somewhere other than CfD I m sure any number of people would be willing to help, me included... - 20:13, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) ******I do not deny that the above 5 nominations were made in responce to his antics, and I do agree this is plain childish. I suppose the point has been made thou. On my part, I will just try my best to write more sg-related articles, hopefully more for the good of this site, and not just because someone is picking on me. I apologise for the above abuse of this page.-- 09:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) *******While I don t care whether it was a response to my antics , nor whether anything was plain childish , please don t shift the responsibility to anybody else. I am not particularly interested in your hometown, and I have never been picking on it. — 16:23, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC) ********As I said, may I hope your actions reflect your true intentions. That you have to suddenly start shifting your attention in nominating several one-article categories above in topics which you are obviously unfamiliar with just raises suspicions on you.-- 20:08, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) *******Don t suspect about this and that, and speculate what I am familiar with. — 20:34, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC) ********No I didnt suspect . I read it from your own comment above. You might also do well doing as you preach too. Whatever the case, I wont think it is a good idea to embarrass ourselves in a page like this, so our petty exchanges can go somewhere else if required.-- 11:57, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Comment Not sufficient basis in itself for a nomination. 18:14, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Comment Sure it is. Superfluous categories are a drain, which is why there is a serious policy discussion to limit their creation. I d also suggest to Instantnood, , honestly, not as his foil, that maybe he should focus his attention on creating a few good articles, rather than constantly creating categories and stubs that end up on VfD and CfD. Categories and stubs are good and useful, but not as useful as really good content. You ve made hundreds of stubs, and plenty of categories, but they wither. Backup a step and write. Set a minimum of say, five good articles, then create the category to house them and you won t be constantly seeing your creations up for deletion. 18:27, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) **Comment. May I point out, that he is using this page to play his childish games of revenge against me just because I nominated several HK-related categories below, in which none of them were nominated purely because they were underpopulated. 18:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) ***Please be careful when you re accusing somebody. I am not only picking Singapore-related categories. — 19:19, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) ****I am not retracting my accusation. Your behavior is way too obvious to be denied. I saw how you were complaining about me with your friends with regards to several categories I nominated, and the next moment I know, you started targeting Singapore categories. I dont think this is pure coincidence. If you think the category has room for growth, you can leave a note in the discussion page. Listing it here means it is the LAST step towards deletion. I do not consider this a cordial way of getting people to develop content, if that is your kind intention .-- 19:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

rename. -- 17:36, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

==Fooican rivers --> Rivers in Fooican==

More logical naming convention. Perhaps we could get a bot to do it:

-- 14:44, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) *Strongly support. - 14:52, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Comment: Generally agree. What about the inconsistence between Rivers in Foo and Rivers of Foo — 15:10, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) *Comment: Please be reminded to put on the tag for block renaming. — 15:30, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) *Move to 02:05, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) *Rename as per Grutness comments. 20:55, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC) Revised list:

04:53, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

*All the above are done except 05:26, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)