Categories for deletion/Log/2005 August 17 |
==August 17==
=== ===
Delete. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
See previous Cfd s 22:27, 17 August 2005 (UTC) :I do not oppose Reinyday s suggestions. 04:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *It should be merged with (if I understand the distinction correctly). -- Reinyday, 22:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *I agree with Reinyday. We should be cautious when recategorizing, though. Some articles probably belong in both categories. 23:43, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *Delete, since similar categories are all deleted/merged. -- 00:06, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Delete per previous CfDs. 00:55, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Delete. Empty and unnecessary. 05:32, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Delete per precedent (and observe we should collect our CfD precdents up somewhere....like 01:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC) *Comment: the category is empty because it was emptied. — ) 05:17, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
Speedy deleted. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Empty; duplicates 22:03, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *Speedy. My weak memory says speedy is allowed in such situations but perhaps I misread something. 22:20, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *speedy delete What do you mean no provision for speedying categories See 22:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC) **Thanks. There is no mention on 13:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC) **We already have 16:16, 19 August 2005 (UTC) *speedy delete. I ve added the tag. 23:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
===Transformers categories===
Delete. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
===Some bird categories===
Rename. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
For consistency with the rest of orders under 19:10, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
*In the same line of though,
Especially since over half the species that can be classified there are not actually called hummingbird (I ll probably later recreate the cat for a related 21:43, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
Superceded and emptied through implementation of )
*Rename per nom. 05:43, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Rename. No argument. 06:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Comment Slightly overenthousiastic user . *Rename, good point. 13:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
===Native American languages===
Rename all. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Native American is an ambiguous term. It can be used and interpreted as referring to either . The following proposals add precision and remove ambiguity from current category names.
Note: 17:55, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
:: is empty through my copy-paste mistake. I apparently forgot about it. Anyway, I moved these subcategories under it. :: A note about , dont get updated even though I updated the template. Why :::You need to go to each article that uses the template and make a null-edit . Just click the edit button, and then click save without doing anything — this causes the article to be updated from the template. Tedious, so you might as well add it to this CfD and we ll have a bot do it. - 01:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC) *This rename makes sense to me as well. The organization of which I am member, The Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, is named similarily. *: Assuming that this rename is ok with everyone, I will make categories for S. Amer in the above proposed fashion, e.g. 19:41, 2005 August 17 (UTC) *Rename. As per proposal, formulations using the term indigenous peoples... are less problematic than those which use native american... ; it is consistent with parallel category schemes on indigenous peoples themselves; indigenous peoples has wide global currency, it is probably the most neutral way of expressing the concept, and the one more readily and commonly understood by readers from parts of the globe outside of the US.-- 23:20, 2005 August 17 (UTC) *Rename per proposal. - 01:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC) *Rename. Makes sense to remove ambiguity, and to use term used by professional associations. 17:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC) *Rename per nom. 18:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)=== ===
Delete. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
*delete. Ditto. -- 06:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *delete. I wonder how people even come up with such weird categories. 11:04, August 17, 2005 (UTC) *delete. And disallow the 15:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
Delete. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
*delete. The category would include all natives of Saint Petersburg and half Russian people, notwithstanding their occupation. I don t think that the criterion is informative, considering that the district was created several years ago and will probably abolished after the end of Putin s tenure. -- 06:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *delete. See comment above. 11:05, August 17, 2005 (UTC) *delete. Pointless category. 15:22, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
=== ===
Speedy deleted. 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
*delete. Nonsense. 00:45, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *delete. Nonsense -- 00:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *delete nonsense. 01:09, August 17, 2005 (UTC) **All additions to the cat were vandalism from unblockable AOL anons. I ve emptied the cat and it needs speedy deleting. - 01:17, 17 August 2005 (UTC) *Speedy delete this cheesy nonsense. 04:48, 2005 August 22 (UTC)
=== ===
Sent to 01:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
*Delete — empty category that is redundant with 00:36, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Defer to 05:36, 18 August 2005 (UTC) *Take to SFD, as it says at the top of the page. BTW - is incorrectly named, and should be simply . 06:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC) **Actually, I ve taken the new category and template there, so don t bother. Badly capitalised, badly named, not created through the stub sorting project (and in fact working directly against current proposals). Created by the looks of it simply to create more work for the stub sorters. Annoying in the extreme. 06:24, 18 August 2005 (UTC) ***So can this CfD debate delete the cat in the nomination - 01:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC) **No, it s a stub category, so it goes to WP:SFD. Similarly, the stub template goes to sfd not tfd. See the Special notes section at the top of this page. 01:21, 20 August 2005 (UTC) *Deferred Changed tag to , discussion deferred until decision made on 17:26, 20 August 2005 (UTC) **Probably - this one s a confusing one that I ve taken to the Stub sorting wikiproject for further consideration. The two categories have both been around for some time but served different purposes. Someone has made a LOT of work for the stub sorters by emptying one of the two categories into the other (the Education one was misnamed as it actually contained stubs related to tertiary education - the General Education one is just miscapitalised, as well as being a cumbersome term). I have suggested ccreating a new Tertiary education one or something similar, then moving everything else into the Education one and deleting the General Education one. Unfortunately the task has been made twice as hard by whoever decided to empty the Education one in the first place :( 06:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC) ***Yea, it would be nice if there were a way to see the category article history. You could always check the last editors contribs and dig through their histories for the missing articles. 07:31, 22 August 2005 (UTC)|
|