Categories for deletion/Log/2005 July 1

== July 1 ==

=== ===

subcat -- 8 July 2005 13:25 (UTC)

Are these the same It looks like they should be merged. -- 1 July 2005 23:16 (UTC) *They are not exactly the same, as TRADOC is more for testing and establishing procedure, but they should be merged under 2 July 2005 00:50 (UTC)

=== ===

delete -- 8 July 2005 13:21 (UTC)

I don t see any reason to categorize articles that have a spoiler in it. There has to be thousands of articles that match this criteria. Not needed. July 1, 2005 21:24 (UTC) *Delete. There s , and another one I can t remember that do the job fine since this information need appear only in the article. - July 2, 2005 01:42 (UTC) *Delete I agree, such a category serves no purpose. The other template is by the way. See 2 July 2005 19:41 (UTC) *Delete, says nothing useful about the articles to which it is applied. - July 3, 2005 23:31 (UTC)

=== ===

delete -- 8 July 2005 13:20 (UTC)

This is a well-known multi-person blog. The cateogory (which was never categorized itself) includes notable columnists who participate in the blog. I am nominating it because I have never seen a comparable category for other publications, either in print or on the web. If this category is acceptable, then it would be logical to have analogous categories for any or all publications with notable columnists. That would include July 1, 2005 20:36 (UTC) *Delete. Promo, vanity. 3 July 2005 20:37 (UTC)

=== ===

delete -- 8 July 2005 13:19 (UTC)

Already exists under the name 1 July 2005 15:09 (UTC) : There should definitely be only one category, but are those characters ( and ) , for example, it would seem this is now (at last) safe. : Assuming the July 6, 2005 13:34 (UTC)

=== ===

keep software development, delete software development process -- 8 July 2005 13:17 (UTC)

Delete. duplicated by 15:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) added later)

*Agreed. Btw please sign your nominations. July 1, 2005 13:41 (UTC) *Delete as suggested. 01:06, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) *Delete per nominator. But suggest renaming to July 3, 2005 15:21 (UTC) :My vote stands. The things listed in this cat are quite specific: they are software development processes. We could make a parent cat July 3, 2005 15:21 (UTC)

Delete. 23:17, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep and Delete June 29, 2005 00:08 (UTC)

Reverse agree with 29 June 2005 02:53 (UTC)

*Keep ) June 29, 2005 18:16 (UTC) *NOTE: This listing is from the 24th. Software development is empty, but there was no consensus on which category to delete (see discussion above). I m putting it back up for another seven days to see if consensus can be reached. -- 1 July 2005 12:28 (UTC)

Agree with proposal to rename as suggested by 2 July 2005 15:06 (UTC)

*Merge and Rename as suggested by . I am also a software developer, and I fully agree with his statement that the term software development process is not commonly used. *Rename as suggested. - July 3, 2005 23:31 (UTC)

=== ===

rename -- 8 July 2005 13:10 (UTC)

*Miscapitalized and I see no reason this should not simply be merged into July 1, 2005 12:19 (UTC) *Rename to Tax reform. This category is relevant to finding other articles on tax reform which would otherwise be buried in July 1, 2005 19:19 (UTC) *Rename. This has room for useful growth. - July 2, 2005 01:44 (UTC)

=== ===

delete -- 8 July 2005 12:54 (UTC)

This empty category is redundant; there was already a 1 July 2005 09:48 (UTC) *While I know that DJ is the most commonly used term, I have some objection to using abbreviations as cat names; I d prefer a rename to Disk jockeys. July 1, 2005 11:29 (UTC) *Comment: There s also the problem that the term DJ can refer to two different things - radio announcers and live club and dance-floor disc mixers. AFAIK Disk jockey only refers to the radio announcer type (although I may be mistaken in this). It might be worth considering the ambiguity of the term DJ before any final decision is made. 1 July 2005 11:49 (UTC) **I m afraid you re mistaken in this (See July 1, 2005 13:41 (UTC) *Keep; agree with **That wouldn t be a keep, if you re agreeing with Radiant; it d be a delete of 3 July 2005 05:17 (UTC)

=== ===

delete -- 8 July 2005 12:54 (UTC)

This empty category is redundant with its parent, 1 July 2005 05:59 (UTC) *Delete. July 1, 2005 13:41 (UTC) *Delete. Aww, can t we merge it :) 1 July 2005 21:02 (UTC)

=== ===

rename -- 8 July 2005 12:55 (UTC)

Rename to 1 July 2005 21:02 (UTC)

Rename --