Google
 
   
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Search
Main Menu
top books
Polls
What do you think about php-deluxe.net?
Excellent!
Cool
Hmm..not bad
What the hell is this?
encyclopedia
recommendation
compare webbrowser
Freenet DSL
Who's Online
9 user(s) are online (7 user(s) are browsing encyclopedia)

Members: 0
Guests: 9

more...
browser tip
Unix Befehle
manual of unix befehle
recommendation!
Sponsored
partner

Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 28

== May 28 ==

=== ===

delete -- 15:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This category has wound up being used as a default has something to do with computing category, rather than being for articles that are specifically about terminology. After some discussion on 23:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, agree with Bryan. 09:26, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, agree with Bryan. -- 12:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, agree with Bryan. -- 17:15, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. It s an attractive nuisance. - 00:15, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • === ===

    delete -- 15:15, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

    Seems like a very broad category which can refer to any form of world record . Either it gets broken down in a logical manner, or we can do away with it completely.-- 18:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

    *Keep and restrict it only for Guiness World Record holders. — 18:18, May 28, 2005 (UTC) **Comment: The Guiness World Record holds hundreds upon hundreds of records related to almost every possible criteria. Is it logical to list every single entry in wikipedia which was mentioned in that publication in this category-- 18:26, 28 May 2005 (UTC) *Delete, entirely far too broad. GWB has well over ten thousand entries; categories should generally be in the 5-50 article range to be pointful. 09:25, May 29, 2005 (UTC) *Delete Not only too broad, but Guiness has commercialized it to the point of frivolity. Pay them and they ll make up a record for you to hold. 19:05, 29 May 2005 (UTC) **True enough :) I remember something about a record for riding backwards on a motorized skateboard with a roast chicken on your head ... 20:58, May 29, 2005 (UTC) *Comment: They select the records. They do not publish every single record into the year book published annually. I am not sure if they re doing the same selection for their website, but there s sure some restrictions that we can impose to downsize the category, keeping on meaningful ones. — 02:02, May 30, 2005 (UTC) **If we have to actually be selective, then the question of where we set the parametres naturally arise. Are we in the position to setup these parametres, creating a POV issue when it is not even neccesary in the first place Seems more trouble than its worth, hence its a delete from me too.-- 06:34, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment, I agree this has problems, but can anyone think of a better category for someone like 18:07, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • I d be tempted to say that that article could just be merged into a list of record holders, since the individual doesn t seem to be notable for anything other than holding a bunch of crazy world records .. -- 18:24, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • ***World record for holding the most world records LOL. I ve added bio-stub to the article, maybe someone could locate Ahsrita s nationality or profession or something. It also seems WP:UA worthy. 12:17, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

    === ===

    delete -- 15:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

    Speedy delete: It has been de-populated, de-categorised and superseded by the correctly (consistently) named 04:48, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

  • ... then why list it here There s a different system for speedies. 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • === ===

    delete -- 15:14, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

    Nothing there and even if there were its under the wrong parent cat. -- 02:33, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

    *There could be something in the future, see 08:12, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • === ===

    keep -- 15:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

    mistakenly thought the ice hockey team was a former 02:04, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

  • COMMENT: You could just create a cat for that league, or leave it where it is. 15:27, 28 May
  • 2005 (UTC)
  • Are there articles on the players in this team If there aren t, then I see no reason to keep it around. If there are some kicking around, this would be a useful place to put them. -- 17:49, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
  • **What, are only players for NHL teams worthy of categorization Following Azkar s suggestion, I ve found and categorized the articles we already have on four players that played for the Vancouver Millionaires. Keep.-- 06:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)