Considered harmful

In , and not Dijkstra) continues to be used to indicate that an article contains controversial and strongly asserted views.

Frank Rubin published a criticism of Dijkstra s letter in the March 1987 Communications of the ACM titled GOTO Considered Harmful Considered Harmful . Donald Moore et al. published a reply in the May 1987 CACM titled GOTO Considered Harmful Considered Harmful Considered Harmful . (Dijkstra s own response to this controversy was thankfully titled [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD10xx/EWD1009.html On a somewhat disappointing correspondence ].)

Some variants with replacement for effect.

=External links=

*[http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html Considered Harmful Essays Considered Harmful]