D6

.

Section headers have been added by for discussions not directly related to the bot s operation.

= TLAs =

Wouldn t it make sense to put 17:05, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

:It sure would, but that template isn t really used much, so I added it directly to the pages. -- User:Docu

=Years=

What on earth do we need year categories for Would this mean 19:35, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

:Oh, I see, it s for things like such in such year in sports, science, etc Well, I suggest that not be extended infinitely into years for which we have no such articles to categorize. 19:36, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

::It s been suggested and discussed at ). -- User:Docu

Wanted to thank you for adding the riot articles to the year categories. I never knew such things existed. -- 01:56, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

And more thanks. I ve been trying to get some of the pages I ve worked on into categories, so more folks may see them - and here you are, doing such a nice job on this! Wonderful job! -- 04:38, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)

=Year of birth/death categories=

== Categories ==

20:45, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:I spotted some of those and fixed them manually. A few Spanish names are sorted inconsistently as well. :I plan to compare the sort key generated by the bot with the ones set for other categories in the same article. I can t do this before the next download is available though. -- User:Docu

:See now: -- User:Docu

== exagerated categories ==

Why not make a Male and Female category btw.... User:Cyprus2k1

:As in -- User:Docu

:: i think that its exagerated... - -- 12:43, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:Yup, adding two more categories to each and every biographical article sounds a bit... bizarre. In many cases there are already three or even more categories. After adding another two (births and deaths) the whole categories line becomes too crowded. I m afraid that your concept might only lead to greater mess. 00:00, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)

::Lyndon B. Johnson had nine categories before .. I doubt the two additions really make it worse. Many biographies don t have any categories at all.

::I won t add BTW -- User:Docu

How about Category:April 1 Births. Honestly, can you hold off running this bot until consensus is developed I think there s enough controversy on these categories that you ought to. 18:34, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I would like to point out that these categories violate both of the criteria on whether a category should be created at 20:10, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

== checking for disambig pages ==

You might want to have the bot check if a page is a disambiguation page before adding a category to it. For example 12:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:They will show up in a subsequent update of BTW. -- User:Docu

Before adding more useless year categories, you may at least want to determine if they are correct, for example in the case of 13:06, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:I will run a variation of to check the plausibility of the information by Wikipedia. -- User:Docu

== Birth/death categories ==

You might want to check that the birth/death categories you re inserting aren t already present in an article, and that you re assigning it to the right year for the right name. 06:31, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC) :Agreed. It looks like there is a bug in this bot. See for example [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtmltitle=Niki_de_Saint_Phalle&curid=351248&diff=0&oldid=0] where two death categories have automatically been added using different lists and giving conflicting sorting. -- 18:46, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

::It s a known problem. If the sort key is different, the bot adds another category. It will be fairly easy to find them once an updated dump of categories is available (i.e. tomorrow, or the day afterwards). -- User:Docu

==Approval==

I was just wondering if you can give me a link to where this bot got approval to run, and for what, exactly. 20:04, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

==Accuracy==

I don t particularly care for these categories, but they re even worse if incorrect. 20:21, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

:It s my manual input that was incorrect. Thank you for pointing it out (and fixing it). - User:Docu

==Suspended==

I ve suspended this bot. The category addition is clearly controversial, and, though the bot was approved, the original request said nothing about category addition. I ve opened up discussion at 20:40, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

:It was approved for running pywikipediabot (which includes the category.py package). The year categories have been discussed and kept. Thus, please unblock the bot. -- User:Docu

::Although the pywikipediabot contains the categories package, it also contains other things, and not all pybots are used for all purposes. I think the categories are a terrible idea, obviously, and that, regardless of the deletion debate, they violate policy. That said, my real concern here is that the bot was given approval purely because there were no objections, and there was no particular discussion of what the bot is going to do, and now it s generating controversy. I d like to at least wait a week and see what kinds of objections arise to a request for bot status that specifies exactly what you intend to do with the bot. I promise not to object myself, and if there s no one else but me and Netoholic that minds, I ll unblock it. 21:46, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

:::It mostly used for adding categories, but it was never used for adding categories we didn t want at all. Obviously, few cared about anyways. -- User:Docu

::::I m unblocking it, because I m leaving the project for a while. 00:58, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)

=== Resuspended ===

I m re-blocking it (when in doubt, you re supposed to block the bot... I m in doubt). There seems to be some evidence of significant objections to its current procedure. - 05:54, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:For the discussion of the scheme see . I think I adressed all the concerns in regards to the way the bot implements the scheme. -- User:Docu

::Since the deletion discussion, many objections have been raised about the category scheme and the bot s activity and accuracy. Nowhere in that vote do you mention to what ends you would go to implement your goal. -- 14:21, 2004 Oct 6 (UTC)

---

IRC: like I said, I don t know what authorized really means anymore, but he knows there are strong objections to the category scheme, and the fact that the bot is making mistakes with the categories

:Objections to both the category scheme, and the bot s accuracy have been noted many times on this talk page, 05:58, 2004 Oct 6 (UTC)

== the births/deaths (automatic) categorization is broken ==

...because it doesn t check whether the article is already there! Please check your recent edits and correct where necessary. 10:45, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:Would you give me a sample, I m not quite sure what you mean. The upload is automatic, not the categorization as such. It s based on manual input. -- User:Docu

:: Please have a look at 13:19, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:::It s mentionned on (and the database available for download) include only one (here that with the explicit sort key). -- User:Docu

::::Should we be bold and clean it manually when it happens, or will that result, likewise, in a double remove of the category (once by the human and once by a corrections bot) 18:31, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:::::If there is a difference in sort keys in the [http://download.wikimedia.org/archives/en/M=D download], these categories show up on the sortkey report, otherwise they don t. In both cases they need to be fixed manually. -- User:Docu

:: In case you didn t notice, today I see another such problem at 18:55, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:::In this case, the category was added with the sort key of , the category was added a 2nd time. It wouldn t have happened if the sort keys were identical or if the manual categories were added before the last [http://download.wikimedia.org/archives/en/M=D download]. The categories on both articles needed to be fixed anyways, as the sort keys were missing. -- User:Docu

= Better sorting for year categories =

Over the past few days I ve been going through , etc., changing category references in the subcategories and constituent articles whose titles begin with the year, to make them sort better on the (parent) Category page.

Examples: On for the effect of these changes.)

I suggest that you change your bot to attempt to do this automatically. That is (for example), if the subcategory or article name (PAGENAME) begins with the same year the parent category name does (followed optionally by the word in ), include a pipe followed by the next word rest of the subcat/article name, forced to be capitalized. Similar changes for the month-year and year-only page names. This might not always work properly, but it would significantly reduce the effort required to fix the categorization manually , as I have been doing.

- 23:29, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)]

:Personally, I think is more difficulte to read than before, the article titles normal sorting separates categories like 2003 in .. and 2003 (xyz) from others. Obviously, if someone choses A-Z sorting over the other, I wouldn t added more in the other sorting.

:For the months, my choice would be to add them to a subcategory of their own. -- User:Docu

:: One of the reasons I prefer sorting by the first significant word is that — to take but one example — there s no logical reason to sort 22:59, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:: I ve asked for other people s opinions on this matter at 23:24, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

::: FYI, I also asked for opinions at the 19:55, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

=Year of birth/death categories (cont.)=

== Duplicate cats ==

The bot is adding duplicate birth/death cats to various pages that have them already, e.g. 16:53, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

::It does happen in the cases mentionned above, but they are fairly rare. Anyways, as the bot is now blocked I suppose it wont happen again. -- User:Docu

:::There is now a fix for this, check: . -- User:Docu

::::I don t speak code, but I assume the bottom line of this is If I unblock the bot, it won t do this again 16:32, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)

:::::More like The number of cases where it happens is limited and User:Docu will fix them afterwards . Later today, once [http://download.wikimedia.org/archives/en/M=D the new download] is available, I will be able to tell precisely how many times it happened in the past and wasn t corrected. -- User:Docu

::::::What s the timeframe on that download 17:20, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)

:::::The report is available now ( ). I will go through it later today. There are about 50 of the 28600 articles categorized that need to be fixed. It can be updated once per week, i.e. when the download version is updated. -- User:Docu

:Bot is blocked again due to its malfunctioning. 17:57, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

::Bot is unblocked in any case. 15:34, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)

:::Thanks. -- User:Docu

== Incorrect date of death ==

It appears that the bot incorrectly added Zviad Gamsakhurd ia s death year incorrectly. Just giving a heads up in case its happening on other pages. -- User:ElBenevolente

:It shouldn t. Thanks for pointing it out. -- User:Docu

::It shouldn t, but it did. It appears to have done the same for 07:11, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:::Not sure, how I could let this one splip through. Thank you for fixing it. -- User:Docu

The article 12:21, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

== Approximate Years ==

I deleted the 1927 birth category from 14:56, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)

:According to I m using those as they allow to locate a person s lifespan on the timeline. -- User:Docu

::*I was not aware of this and have therefore restored the category tag. Thanks for your reply. 18:04, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)

=== Birth/Death categories (talk moved by Netoholic)===

Moved conversation from bot talk page to 16:27, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)

== Birth Death categories added to articles that are not about one person==

Birth and death years have been added inappropriately to some articles that are about groups of people, rather than a single person, for example 20:49, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

:Generally a bad idea indeed. One most was selected as it was in a category including mainly biographies, the other as the name starts with a title similar to other biographies. I try to filter them, but must have missed those. I will check past additions with and in the title. -- User:Docu

::I probably should give the question further thought. It may be usefull to include, e.g. Leopold and Loeb in one way or the other into the categories. -- User:Docu

== Disambiguation Page Birth/Death Year ==

02:59, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:It happened as the article was moved away since the last available (generally weekly updated) download version. A report is run on the download version to fix these cases . Thank you for fixing this one. -- User:Docu

==Jimmy Nicol==

I don t know where D6 gets its information, but it recently altered 08:29, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

:It starts out with the first year in the article (if the article is reasonably formatted it s the year of birth). I then screen the list and should correct/throw out all wrong ones .. I m sure he was re-born that year .. Thank you for fixing it. -- User:Docu

== Birth/Deaths at beginning of category lists ==

Hi,

It seems like the birth/death dates are pretty reasonable things to add to articles, but would it be possible to have them added at the end of the existing category lists Seeing Categories: 1916 births | 2001 deaths | Prize in Economics winners | Turing Award Laureate | Carnegie Mellon professors at the end of the 03:51, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:Initially the bot added the categories and sorted all of them alphabetically (pywikipediabot standard). Following ( , I stopped adding the categories to articles with more than three other categories.

:The bot can now also add them at the end of the list. Recently, I started using the later mode, especially with articles with more than 3 other categories (baseball players, e.g.). Note that other bots may still add/sort their additions differently, e.g. at Herbert Simon. -- User:Docu

=Main article in category=

==Military slang category==

This category has only one article, which is itself Military slang. I don t see the point. 17:18, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:If needs to be in there. As I didn t create it, I don t mind if you have it deleted. -- User:Docu

== Categories ==

Please stop indiscriminatory adding categories that match article name. 18:22, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:Would you explain which articles are incorrectly categorised (see ), rather than indiscriminately reversing other people s contributions -- User:Docu ::Now I am not at all sure that these contributions are of people , unless you are a cyborg. As for undiscriminately, you are right. Sorry. I will revert only some of them. 18:49, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:::The initial input was compiled by myself (trying to avoid matching e.g. ). In the meantime, I think I fixed all of them. Amazing that several of these articles were uncategorized before! -- User:Docu

==Categories and languages==

I have removed the addition of 19:43, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:Removing the coordinating article from its own category makes it more difficulte to locate the category for those starting out with the article. This is one of the reason why it s generally placed in the category ( ). :The sortkey * may be used to indicate that ). :Personally, I d readd the category, but I understand your reasons. I will try to skip the categories in case of a future update. -- User:Docu Reading your explanation, I think I acted too fast. Some months ago, there was a similar problem when I tried to categorize some language articles myself. I got lost in all the conventions about categories and the only solution I could find at that time was just to exclude the parent from its category. I was not aware of the use of the asterisk as sortkey. Thank you for providing me with links to the relevant passages and for your kind reply. I m sorry for my impatient attitude. You convinced me; you can happily readd the category. You can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtmltitle=Special:Contributions&target=Mark+Dingemanse check] my last contributions to see the six language family articles I was aware of where I deleted your addition (see edit summaries). 23:51, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:In case I ll do another series, I will readd the categories. BTW it s convincible that one day it will be done the other way again .. -- User:Docu

== Category:Madhyamaka ==

When you apply a category to a page, you should remove higher-level categories of which that category is a subcategory; i.e., I removed the Branches of Buddhism category tag on the

:As this is a case where it s acceptable to add (keep) the parent category as well ( ), I don t think the bot should make such a change. -- User:Docu

== ==

Is there are reason why the bot added this category It is completely nonstandard. 02:20, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

:It was added because it exists. It was created by . Personally I think it should be deleted. -- User:Docu

::Sorry, I just saw that D6 had added 03:30, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

== Fijian people ==

Hi Docu. I m curious about why you keep on adding the 09:54, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:It s mainly because it matches the title and I didn t see earlier that it was reverted (in the unlikely case of another run, I think I should crosscheck the list against previous uploads). In this particular case, I think the inclusion is defendable, even if it only covers the topic partially. At least, I didn t throw it out at a quick glance after the first addition. BTW I added to the category, which would exclude the future addition of the category to the article with the same name. -- User:Docu

::Thanks for explaining 21:36, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

=Year of birth/death categories (cont 3)=

==James Kelly==

Why did D6 add 10:14, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

:Good question. Finally I found it. was added to all people listed there. :Maybe I should make . -- User:Docu

::I went through creating a disambiguation page for the name. -- User:Docu

== Double birth/death categories ==

This bot is still producing double categories, see 22:17, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) *I m aware of that and fixing them once the download version is updated ( ). --- User:Docu

= Ogg files =

Hi there! Is there any chance to use the bot to add the to all .ogg files from the upload logs I tried to do it myself by hand until I realised that there is actually a lot of ogg files out there and it would take years to complete this.

I believe that such category is needed since there is no list of ogg files so far and the files are listed only by their license categories, not by their type. This can often be misleading, since the ogg file can hardly be called an image... 05:52, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

=Year of birth/death categories (cont 4)=

== Adding birth and death cat to (articles with ) ==

Moved :

I noticed your bot adding cats for birth and death to lots of bios, which is fine. But it seems to add the cats also when they aren t needed. i.e. when there allready is a 06:56, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

:The problem is similar to the problem mentioned at into category links by bot and possibly add a check to the bot when running. -- User:Docu

::Ok, thanks, I see. But wouldn t it be better to have a bot doing it the other way To convert the birth/died cat lines into template lived, instead Templates are nice, in this case it s shorter, and there are stuff you can more conveniently do with templates. Say we someday want to add images for death or birth, or do other stuff with their appearance, then changing one template is really easy and convenient. But converting to the template is of course a rather big change, and I guess this isn t the place to discuss it. 06:19, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:::In general, I tend to agree with you, though for now, there aren t that many tools to maintain and use template-based information, especially compared to categories. Besides, given the number of uses I had to fix, (in my version). -- User:Docu

=Disambiguating=

Hi! Good work disambiguating Georgia , but please watch out that you re selecting the correct meaning (you picked the wrong one for 14:00, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:Thanks. Guess who noticed first! -- User:Docu

I ve reverted your disambiguation of Georgia 09:52, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:Please excuse, I generally don t disambiguate pages outside article namespace. I exceptionally do, if the section looks like one of a ready-made article. In your case, the updated link was made through a deliberate later). -- User:Docu

*South beach disambiguation. Thanks for correcting that, I just assumed the template would be disambiguation and disambig redirected to it. Guess I should have actually checked :) 05:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::Doh! I forgot this was your bot. 05:39, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

= additions =

== Embedded template causing problem with coordinate conversion ==

It would appear that it is not possible to use a template within a parameter of another. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo&diff=11193930&oldid=11160940 This edit] demonstrates the problem. Are you using a bot Can your changes be quickly checked and rolled back if necessary -- 08:38, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

:I m aware of the problem and I thought I had reverted all of those cases already ( are a problem). Thank you for fixing this one. -- User:Docu

Perhaps a similar problem with 19:36, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:Yes, thank you for spotting it. I didn t come across it on the log yet. I added ). -- User:Docu

==Protected areas, National parks==

::Please stop these edits - you have now messed up all the templates for national parks. Not to mention the fact that you didn t discuss this change on the WikiProject:Protected Areas and that is is printing a unreadable chararcter for minutes instead of just using . On the Protected area template you have replaced *Longitude: xx° xx N *Latitude: xx ° xx W

with *Longitude: xx ° xx′ N xx° xx′ W Please revert these changes. 23:04, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

:I was checking the different changes, e.g. Capitol Reef National Park and the main change needed it appears to be a change of Longitude to coordinates . Alternatively, LongitudeLatitude could go in the same cell. The coordinates formatted according to the manual of style display correctly.

:When updating the National Parks of Australia, I hadn t found a template or a centeral point for those. The few that did indeed have a infobox, it appears now that it s the one I missed, i.e. the template for protected areas. -- User:Docu

::Detailed proposal, see:

== Johnston Atoll ==

Moved from: User talk:Docu

FYI, the for an example.

:Thanks. I came across that one, just to find that it was fixed (still need to amend the regex though). -- User:Docu

/Moved from User talk:Docu

== Bot damage (coordinates template) ==

Hi, it looks like your bot was a bit careless: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Extreme_points_of_Russia&diff=11264687&oldid=11263745]. I ve reverted this, and I ll check the other 23:06, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I ve reverted 23:14, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:I was going through the log and was about to revert them. Thank you for checking them. -- User:Docu

== More unlinked coordinates ==

I found an article with geographic coordinates that aren t linked to template:coor or anything else yet: 05:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

: , I m trying to find an agreement with Rambot/Ram-Man about the format to be used for the coordinates in the text as I m planning to convert the few (200-400) rambot entries that don t have a mapit or geolink template. For the remaining ones, it might be easier if Rambot would do it during one of his occasional updates, once the definite format for coordinates is chosen. Maybe we could change the template to make it clear that it includes those links. -- User:Docu

Fair enough. I just noticed the coordinates at the top of the article weren t linked, and never thought to also look at the bottom. Thanks. -- 11:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:Well as there are quite a few of them, it s preferable that the conversion is included in another update (the bot would easily be busy for 3 days). -- User:Docu

== More grist for your bot ==

06:15, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== Mountain dms coordinates break into two lines ==

They break into two lines, even with only 0.1″ accuracy. For example, see 17:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

= John Taylor =

Just noticed that your bot is moving the disambiguation wikilink from John Taylor to John Taylor (disambiguation) which then redirects to John Taylor. Is there something I don t know that this is the correct link If not can you restore them 16:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:It makes it easier to figure out which links to ). -- User:Docu

::Thanks - I just noticed that all these John Taylors don t have a reference back to the disambiguation page so I added them manually. I ll do it the other way from now on. 16:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:Some sort of a template would be great for this, e.g. (it might need improvement). -- User:Docu

=Events by year BC=

Would it be possible for D6 to create articles redirecting to the relevant decade for all the the years 1500 BC - 500 BC Currently this have been done somewhat sporadically. 19:40, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:Yes. I checked there are already 613 such redirects (on April 6) and all decade articles have already been created. -- User:Docu

::Thanks 14:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

= Mistake in selecting date of birth =

Please check the edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Howard_Barker&diff=10967540&oldid=10919561] to the page 12:29, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

:Prior to upload, a list is compiled from the years in articles. The list is reviewed (by me) and then uploaded. Occasionally a year such as the sample above escapes my attention. It should be found by reports such the oldest etc. I should indeed work on that lists, fixing errors such as that and finding missing years (even more so, but they aren t necessarily in the articles already). -- User:Docu

= Disambig =

It s not at all important, but I m very curious as to why you took the time to edit 21:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

:There were a series of disambiguation pages that came up as uncategorized (mainly because they haven t been edited since ). To have them categorized, one needed to do a null edit on them (this is now done, less then twenty are left). As there remained a few uncategorized pages using the 5 or 6 redirects pointing to template:disambig, I figured it was easier to add the template w/o the redirect to the page directly. -- User:Docu

:I just found that it isn t really needed from this point of view as most, if not all pages with template:Disambiguation are in fact categorized in . -- User:Docu

:The pages are now all categorized and use the default template. -- User:Docu

= Year categories revisited =

I see that last year you added year categories to the various ) 22:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

=People still missing DOB categories=

There are still a huge bunch of people who are missing their proper categories of year births and year deaths. (I went through bunch of golfers today) So I wonder what s the deal Does that mean that the bot does not recognize those articles as people articles I know that some articles were created after May 16 (that s the last update, right), but some were around for a long time. Does that mean that those categories MUST be added manually Or is there a way to speed it up (say selecting categories which contain mainly people) I sincerely want to help, so just let me know if there is something to do. 06:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

:The bot generally doesn t added them entirely automatically. I need to review the entries before uploading. An exception used to be the entries generated from lists such as List of people by name or Deaths in 2003 etc. :If the articles are well formatted (with dates or year of birth/death at the beginning of articles), it s fairly easy to do. The best help would probably be to review lists such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Wikipedia:People_by_year/Reports/Canadians/Missing_years&oldid=15080797] (this is outdated) and, where needed, format years in the standard way or add where none is available (the later category could be added by bot as well). At a later stage, D6 would add the year categories. This would obviously needs some work on my side, especially now that the download version of Wikipedia has a new format. -- User:Docu

= Rivers of .... =

15:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

:Personally I d favour this renaming, but apparently it was shortly discussed and then left undecided. Thus I d prefer if you list them at CfD first. -- User:Docu

= Georgia =

Thanks for the disambig. I m hoping to add the rest of the A-Z over the next week or two and then it ll be quite a big job to perfect all the links.

All the best.

-- 15:08, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

=Georgia=

I m finding your bot is undoing my intentional separation of Savannah and Georgia . I am trying to create a link to both rather than just a link to Savannah. If this is against the standards please advise as I want to be consistent, otherwise what can be done

21:40, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

:I m not sure which edit you are refering to, but it s a choice sometimes made when disambiguating, e.g. ). -- User:Docu

= Vasco da Gama =

An article that you ve edited before ( 02:59, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

=French departements=

Hey what is this new ifobox for French departements 17:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

:Just the same as before, but in a template. -- User:Docu

= Henry the Navigator =

An article that you ve edited before ( 20:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)