Google
 
   
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Search
Main Menu
top books
Polls
What do you think about php-deluxe.net?
Excellent!
Cool
Hmm..not bad
What the hell is this?
encyclopedia
recommendation
compare webbrowser
Freenet DSL
Who's Online
9 user(s) are online (9 user(s) are browsing encyclopedia)

Members: 0
Guests: 9

more...
browser tip
Unix Befehle
manual of unix befehle
recommendation!
Sponsored
partner

De Rham cohomology

In mathematics, de Rham cohomology is a tool belonging both to algebraic topology and to differential topology, capable of expressing basic topological information about smooth manifolds in a form particularly adapted to computation and the concrete representation of cohomology classes. It is a cohomology theory based on the existence of differential forms with prescribed properties. It is in different, definite senses dual both to singular homology, and to Alexander-Spanier cohomology.

=Definition=

The set of smooth, differentiable differential k -forms on any smooth manifold M form an abelian group (in fact a real number vector space) called

:Ω k ( M )

under addition. The exterior derivative d gives mappings

: d :Ω k ( M ) → Ω k +1( M ). There is a fundamental relationship

: d 2 = 0;

this follows essentially from symmetry of second derivatives. Therefore vector spaces of k -forms along with the exterior derivative are a cochain complex, the de Rham complex :

:C^infty(M) = Omega^0(M) o Omega^1(M) o Omega^2(M) o Omega^3(M) o ldots.

In differential geometry terminology, forms which are exterior derivatives are called exact and forms whose exterior derivatives are 0 are called closed (see closed and exact differential forms); the relationship d 2 = 0 then says that : exact forms are closed .

The converse, however, is not in general true; closed forms need not be exact. The idea of de Rham cohomology is to classify the different types of closed forms on a manifold. One performs this classification by saying that two closed forms α and β in Omega^k(M) are cohomologous if they differ by an exact form, that is, if alpha-eta is exact. This classification induces an equivalence relation on the space of closed forms in Omega^k(M). One then defines the k -th de Rham cohomology group

: H k dR( M )

to be the set of equivalence classes, that is, the set of closed forms in Omega^k(M) modulo the exact forms.

Note that, for any manifold M with n Connected space,

: H 0dR( M ) = Rn

where the equals actually denotes that the two are homomorphism. This follows from the fact that any C^infty function on M with zero derivative is locally constant on each of the connected components.

=de Rham cohomology computed=

One may often find the general de Rham cohomologies of a manifold using the above fact about the zero cohomology and a Mayer-Vietoris sequence. Another useful fact is that the de Rham cohomology is a Homotopy invariant. While the computation is not given, the following are the computed de Rham cohomologies for some common topological objects:

The n-sphere:

For the n-sphere, and also when taken together with a product of open intervals, we have the following. Let n > 0, m ≥ 0, and I an open real interval. Then: :H_{dR}^{k}(S^n imes I^m) simeq egin{cases} mathbb{R} & mbox{if } k = 0,n \ 0 & mbox{if } k e 0,n end{cases}

The n-torus:

Similarly, allowing n > 0 here, we obtain: :H_{dR}^{k}(T^n) simeq mathbb{R}^{n choose k}

Punctured Euclidean space:

Punctured Euclidean space is simply Euclidean space with the origin removed. For n > 0, we have: :

The Möbius strip, M:

This more or less follows from the fact that the mobius strip may be, loosely speaking, contracted to the 1-sphere: :H_{dR}^{k}(M) simeq H_{dR}^{k}(S^1)

=Harmonic forms=

If M is a compact Riemannian manifold, then each equivalence class in H k dR( M ) contains exactly one harmonic form. That is, every member ω of a given equivalence class of closed forms can be written as

:omega = dalpha+gamma where α is some form, and γ is harmonic: Δγ=0.

Recall that any harmonic function on a compact Riemannian manifold is a constant. Thus, this particular representative element can be understood to be an extremum (a minimum) of all cohomologously equivalent forms on the manifold. For example, on a 2-torus, one may envision a constant 1-form as one where all of the hair is combed neatly in the same direction (and all of the hair having the same length). In this case, there are two cohomologically distinct combings; all of the others are linear combinations. In particular, this implies that the 1-th Betti number of a two-torus is two. More generally, on an n -dimensional torus T n, one can consider the various combings of k -forms on the torus. There are n choose k such combings that can be used to form the basis vectors for H k dR( T n); the k -th Betti number for the de Rham cohomology group for the n-torus is thus n choose k .

More precisely, for a differential manifold M , one may equip it with some auxiliary Riemannian metric. Then the Laplacian Δ is defined by

:Delta=ddelta+delta d with d the exterior derivative and δ the codifferential. The Laplacian is a homogeneous (in graded algebra) linear differential operator acting upon the exterior algebra of differential forms: we can look at its action on each component of degree k separately.

If M is .

=Hodge decomposition=

Letting δ be the codifferential, one says that a form ω is co-closed if δω=0 and co-exact if ω=δα for some form α. The Hodge decomposition states that any k-form ω can be split into three lp space components:

:omega = dalpha +delta eta + gamma

where γ is harmonic: Δ γ = 0. This follows by noting that exact and co-exact forms are orthogonal; the orthogonal complement then consists of forms that are both closed and co-closed: that is, of harmonic forms. Here, orthogonality is defined with respect to the lp space inner product on Omega^k(M):

:(alpha,eta)=int_M alpha wedge *eta

A precise definition and proof of the decomposition requires the problem to be formulated on Sobolev spaces. The idea here is that a Sobolev space provides the natural setting for both the idea of square-integrability and for the discussion of the convergence of a Cauchy sequence of forms to a limiting form. This language helps overcome some of the limitations of requiring compact support, such as in Alexander-Spanier cohomology.

=de Rham s theorem=

De Rham s theorem, proved by Georges de Rham in 1931, states that for a compact oriented smooth manifold M , the groups H k dR( M ) are isomorphic as real vector spaces with the singular cohomologys

: Hk ( M ;R).

The wedge product endows the direct sum of these groups with a ring (mathematics) structure. A further result of the theorem is that the two cohomology rings are isomorphic (as graded rings).

The general Stokes theorem is an expression of duality between de Rham cohomology and the homology (mathematics) of Chain (mathematics).

=Isomorphism Theorem=

The de Rham cohomology is to a point, and all finite intersections of sets in U are either empty or contractible to a point).