Groklaw

I m not entirely sure I understand the intent of this sentence:

: It became a web site in September 2003, when its popularity caused it to outgrow the Blog software.

Isn t Groklaw both a blog and a web site simultaneously, as a 08:08, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)

:It s probably just as you guess, meaning it is no longer blog software being used for personal notes but instead more of a news/research site. Perhaps a rephrasing is in order. 10:41, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

---

Groklaw obviously belongs in 05:32, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)

The following: ..However, all the attacks have one thing in common: they never attack content of the site in any specifics; it so far has all been personal attacks on PJ.. is just pure BS, in my opinon. Nobody ever voiced a single criticism of Groklaw which wasn t a personal attack on PJ Even a cursory search on Google gives reason to believe otherwise [http://linux-blog.org/exit.phpurl_id=655&entry_id=62 1] [http://linux-blog.org/index.php/archives/62-Disagreements-+-Groklaw-Deletion.html 2]. Also the reference to the alleged (who alleges otherwise) suicides and the implication that they were not is not NPOV, but also distasteful, direspectful, morally reprehensible and sensationalist. I am deleting that entire paragraph. 16:56, 28 September 2005 (UTC)