Group action |
This article is about the mathematical concept. For the sociology term, see group action (sociology).
In .
= Definition =
If G is a group (mathematics) and X is a set, then a (left) group action of G on X is a binary function g : G × X → X (where the image of g in G and x in X is written as g · x ) which satisfies the following two axioms:
From these two axioms, it follows that for every g in G , the function which maps x in X to g · x is a bijective function from X to X . Therefore, one may alternatively and equivalently define a group action of G on X as a group homomorphism G → Sym( X ), where Sym( X ) denotes the group of all bijective maps from X to X .
If a group action G × X → X is given, we also say that G acts on the set X or X is a G -set.
In complete analogy, one can define a right group action of G on X as a function X × G → X by the two axioms *( x · g )· h = x ·( gh )
= Examples =
= Types of actions =
The action of G on X is called
Every free action on a non-empty set is faithful. A group G acts faithfully on X iff the homomorphism G → Sym( X ) has a trivial kernel (algebra). Thus, for a faithful action, G is isomorphic to a permutation group on X ; specifically, G is isomorphic to its image in Sym( X ).
The action of any group G on itself by left multiplication is regular, and thus faithful as well. Every group can, therefore, be embedded in the symmetric group on its own elements, Sym( G ) — a result known as Cayley s theorem.
If G does not act faithfully on X , one can easily modify the group to obtain a faithful action. If we define N = { g in G : g · x = x for all x in X }, then N is a normal subgroup of G ; indeed, it is the kernel of the homomorphism G → Sym( G ). The factor group G / N acts faithfully on X by setting ( gN )· x = g · x . The original action of G on X is faithful if and only if N = { e }.
= Orbits and stabilizers =
Consider a group G acting on a set X . The orbit of a point x in X is the set of elements of X to which x can be moved by the elements of G . The orbit of x is denoted by Gx :
:Gx = left{ gcdot x mid g in G ight}
The defining properties of a group guarantee that the set of orbits of X under the action of G form a partition of a set of X . The associated equivalence relation is defined by saying x ~ y iff there exists a g in G with g · x = y . The orbits are then the equivalence classes under this relation; two elements x and y are equivalent iff their orbits are the same, i.e. Gx = Gy .
The set of all orbits of X under the action of G is written as X / G , and is called the quotient of the action; in geometric situations it may be called the orbit space .
If Y is a subset of X , we write GY for the set { g · y : y in Y and g in G }. We call the subset Y invariant under G if GY = Y (which is equivalent to GY ⊆ Y ). In that case, G also operates on Y . The subset Y is called fixed under G if g · y = y for all g in G and all y in Y . Every subset that s fixed under G is also invariant under G , but not vice versa.
Every orbit is an invariant subset of X on which G acts transitively. The action of G on X is transitive if and only if all elements are equivalent, meaning that there is only one orbit.
For every x in X , we define the stabilizer subgroup of x (also called the isotropy group or little group) as the set of all elements in G that fix x : :G_x = {g in G mid gcdot x = x} This is a subgroup of G , though typically not a normal one. The action of G on X is free if and only if all stabilizers are trivial. The kernel N of the homomorphism G → Sym( X ) is given by the intersection (set theory) of the stabilizers G x for all x in X .
Orbits and stabilizers are not unrelated. For a fixed x in X , consider the map from G to X given by g |-> g · x . The image (mathematics) of this map is the orbit of x and the coimage is the set of all left cosets of Gx . The standard quotient theorem of set theory then gives a natural bijection between G / G x and Gx . Specifically, the bijection is given by hGx |-> h · x . This result is known as the orbit-stabilizer theorem.
If G and X are finite then the orbit-stabilizer theorem, together with Lagrange s theorem, gives :|Gx| = [G,:,G_x] = |G| / |G_x| This result is especially useful since it can be employed for counting arguments.
Note that if two elements x and y belong to the same orbit, then their stabilizer subgroups, G x and G y , are group isomorphism. More precisely: if y = g · x , then G y = gG x g −1.
A result closely related to the orbit-stabilizer theorem is Burnside s lemma: :left|X/G ight|=frac{1}{left|G ight|}sum_{gin G}left|X^g ight| where X g is the set of points fixed by g . This result is mainly of use when G and X are finite, when it can be interpreted as follows: the number of orbits is equal to the average number of points fixed per group element.
= Morphisms and isomorphisms between G -sets =
If X and Y are two G -sets, we define a morphism from X to Y to be a function f : X → Y such that f ( g . x ) = g . f ( x ) for all g in G and all x in X . Morphisms of G -sets are also called equivariant maps or G-maps .
If such a function f is bijective, then its inverse is also a morphism, and we call f an Isomorphism and the two G -sets X and Y are called isomorphic ; for all practical purposes, they are indistinguishable in this case.
Some example isomorphisms:
With this notion of morphism, the collection of all G -sets forms a category theory; this category is a topos.
= Continuous group actions =
One often considers continuous group actions: the group G is a topological group, X is a topological space, and the map G × X → X is continuous function (topology) with respect to the product topology of G × X . The space X is also called a G-space in this case. This is indeed a generalization, since every group can be considered a topological group by using the discrete space. All the concepts introduced above still work in this context, however we define morphisms between G -spaces to be continuous maps compatible with the action of G . The quotient X / G inherits the quotient topology from X , and is called the quotient space of the action. The above statements about isomorphisms for regular, free and transitive actions are no longer valid for continuous group actions.
If G is a discrete group acting on a topological space X , the action is properly discontinuous if for any point x in X there is an open neighborhood U of x in X , such that the set of all g in G for which g(U) cap U e emptyset is a finite set. If X is a Covering map#Deck transformation group, regular covers of another topological space Y , then the action of the Covering map#Deck transformation group, regular covers on X is properly discontinuous as well as being free. Every free, properly discontinuous action of a group G on a connected, path connected, topological space X arises in this manner: the quotient map X mapsto X/G is a regular covering map, and the deck transformation group is the given action of G on X .
An action of a group G on a locally compact space X is cocompact if there exists a compact subset A of X such that GA = X . For a properly discontinuous action, cocompactness is equivalent to compactness of the quotient space X/G .
= Generalizations =
One can also consider actions of monoid on sets, by using the same two axioms as above. This does not define bijective maps and equivalence relations however.
Instead of actions on sets, one can define actions of groups and monoids on objects of an arbitrary in this fashion.
One can view a group G as a category with a single object in which every morphism is invertible. A group action is then nothing but a functor from G to the category of sets, and a group representation is a functor from G to the category of vector spaces. In analogy, an action of a groupoid is a functor from the groupoid to the category of sets or to some other category.
Without using the language of categories, one can extend the notion of a group action on a set X by studying as well its induced action on the power set of X . This is useful, for instance, in studying the action of the large Mathieu group on a 24-set and in studying symmetry in certain models of finite geometry. See [http://log24.com/theory/patt.html pattern groups].|
|