Network File System (NFS) is a protocol originally developed by Sun Microsystems in 1984 and defined in Request for Commentss 1094, 1813, and 3530 (obsoletes 3010), as a distributed file system which allows a computer to access files over a network as easily as if they were on its local disks. NFS is one of many protocols built on the ONC RPC (ONC RPC).

Version 2 of the protocol originally operated entirely over User Datagram Protocol and was meant to keep the protocol stateless server, with Lock (software engineering) (for example) implemented outside of the core protocol.

Version 3 introduced support for using Transmission Control Protocol as transport. While it is true several vendors had already extended NFS Version 2 to support TCP as transport, Sun Microsystems introduced TCP as a transport for NFS at the same time it introduced Version 3. Using TCP as transport made using NFS over a Wide Area Network more feasible.

Version 4, influenced by Andrew file system, and CIFS includes performance improvements, mandates strong security, and introduces a State (computer science) protocol. Version 4 was the first version developed with the IETF (IETF) after Sun Microsystems handed over the development of the NFS protocols.

Various side-band protocols have been added to NFS, including:

WEBNFS is an extension to Version 2 and Version 3 which allows NFS to be more easily integrated into Web browsers and to enable operation through firewalls.

NFS is strongly associated with UNIX systems, though it can be used on any platform such as Apple Macintosh, Microsoft Windows and Novell NetWare operating systems. The Server Message Block (SMB also known as CIFS) and NetWare Core Protocol (NCP), similar protocols, are equivalent implementations of a network file system under other operating systems.

The term network file system is also often used as a generic term — see file system for other examples.

= Politics =

== 1980s ==

NFS and ONC were prominent in the network computing war between Sun Microsystems and Apollo Computer, and later the UNIX wars between AT&T and Sun on one side, and Digital Equipment, HP, and IBM on the other.

At the time ONC was invented (called SunRPC at the time), Apollo s Network Computing System (NCS) was the only system comparable to ONC. Several religious battles over fundamental differences in the two remote procedure call systems developed. The major bone of contention was that ONC s method for data encoding External Data Representation (XDR), always rendered integers in big-endian order, even if both peers of the connection had little-endian machine architectures, whereas NCS s method attempted to avoid byte swap whenever the endianess of both peers machine architectures was the same. An industry group called the Network Computing Forum was formed in an ultimately failed attempt to reconcile the two network computing environments.

Later, Sun and AT&T announced that the two firms would jointly develop AT&T s next version of UNIX: System V Release 4. This announcement enraged many of AT&T s licensees of UNIX System V, and ultimately led to Digital Equipment, HP, IBM, and others forming the Open Software Foundation (OSF). Ironically, Sun and AT&T had previously been in a battle between NFS and AT&T s Remote File System (RFS), and it was the quick adoption of NFS over RFS by Digital Equipment, HP, IBM, and many other computer vendors that decided the NFS versus RFS battle in the favor of NFS.

OSF solicited the proposals for various technologies, including the GUI (GUI), the remote procedure call system, and the remote file access protocol. In the end, a proposal for the latter two, called respectively, the Distributed Computing Environment (DCE), and the DCE Distributed File System (DFS) won over Sun s proposed ONC and NFS. DCE was derived from a suite of technologies, including NCS and Kerberos, and DFS used DCE as the RPC and was further derived from AFS.

== 1990s ==

Sun Microsystems and the ISOC (ISOC) reached an agreement to hand change control of ONC RPC so that ISOC s engineering standards body, the IETF (IETF) could publish standards documents (RFCs) documenting the ONC RPC protocols, and at IETF s option, extend ONC RPC. OSF attempted to have DCE RPC be an IETF standard, but ultimately was unwilling to give up control. Later, IETF chose to extend ONC RPC by adding a new authentication flavor, RPCSEC_GSS, in order to meet IETF s requirements that protocol standards have adequate security.

Later, Sun and ISOC reached a similar agreement to give ISOC change control over NFS, although the contract was carefully written to exclude NFS version 2 and version 3. Instead, ISOC was given the right to add new versions to the NFS protocol, which resulted in NFS version 4 being developed by IETF in 2002.

== 2000s ==

By the 21st century, neither DFS nor AFS had achieved any major commercial success as compared to CIFS or NFS. IBM, which had previously acquired the primary commericial vendor of DFS and AFS, TransARC, announced it would cease selling or supporting DFS or AFS, and donated the source code to the AFS client to the open source community. The OpenAFS project lives on.

= External links =