Google
 
   
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Search
Main Menu
top books
Polls
What do you think about php-deluxe.net?
Excellent!
Cool
Hmm..not bad
What the hell is this?
encyclopedia
recommendation
compare webbrowser
Freenet DSL
Who's Online
4 user(s) are online (4 user(s) are browsing encyclopedia)

Members: 0
Guests: 4

more...
browser tip
Unix Befehle
manual of unix befehle
recommendation!
Sponsored
partner

Nknight

Greetings and all that, since I m the first to write on your talk page. With regards to the album moving, I m moving them to the correct title according to the standards of the language. What is written on the cover may not be what the title is officially designated as, so it s probably very difficult to know exactly how the title should be punctuated. Some of the ones I m moving are probably wrong, but these can be moved when this is confirmed and until then, I think it is better that other contributors can reliably guess what the correct title is for easy linkage. I won t revert any that you move back, unless I m sure it s wrong. :Particularly with regards to

::It s not something I m terribly worried about, I just wanted to make sure that the subject was brought up. I m fully in agreement regarding the standards of English calling for lowercase prepositions in titles, and I probably wouldn t have even bothered to say anything except seeing Bridge over Troubled Water was somewhat jarring :). 10:48 Jan 2, 2003 (UTC)


Hi, you cast a vote in the TEMP5 debate. The Temp5 proposal was voted down by 61.3% to 38.6%. We seem to be going around in circles on the whole issue of the main page. A new vote is now taking place to clarify what exactly we want, namely # Do we actually want to have a new page # If so when (immediately, after a pause, timed to the press release, etc) # What do people want on the front page and what do they want excluded

As of now, the whole issue seems surrounded by complete confusion. This way, finally and definitively , we will know what we want and when we want it. So do please express your opinions. The vote is on the same page as the previous votes. 20:31, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)

= classifier in prog lang article names =

*I sincerely apologize if I have caused you any difficulty. I have indeed read the language naming policy page, but found its contents do not reflect the vast majority of the existing prog lang articles, most of which were created with the programming language classifier . Sure enough, the real names do not include the programming language phrase: the phrase is a classifier (I don t see it as a disambiguator, there are other mechanisms for doing that). Furthermore, the policy page actually suggests creating something like LanguaName programming language and redirect this to the LanguageName article... what s the point for doing that The other way around does make sense. In fact, the classifier should not end up being programming language but (programming language) so that the wiki shortcuts would apply (perhaps the right administrator might attempt that change later). Besides trying to put some order into what was the mess in Category:Programming Languages (it used to include not only prog langs, but also prog langs lists, programming terms, among other things) I have also created the FL, FP, Function-level, ZPL, among other, content articles. Finally, I don t think it speaks well of Wikipedia s level of quality if there is such inconsistency on a page as there was in the prog langs category page: some languages were labeled LanguageName programming language and redirected from LanguageName , others did the exact opposite (in fact,Tcl, Modula-2, Modula-3, and Objective-C still go the other way)... that s more like a mess to me. But if you detail how the changes have affected you, I will see how to fix it. Thanks for your comment. Wish you a good day.

= Article Licensing =

Hi, I ve Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

  • - Lots of questions answered
  • To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the template into their user page, but there are other options at . The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

    :Option 1 :I agree to all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below: : OR :Option 2 :I agree to , county, or city article as described below: :

    Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace with . If you only prefer using the

    = Abuse by Stirling Newbury =

    Nknight, I am at a loss as to how to deal with 18:56, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

    = Disrupting Wikipedia vote =

    You voted once for the policy at 17:12, 13 May 2005 (UTC)