PeopleSoft

PeopleSoft, Inc. was a Software company that provided enterprise resource planning, Human Resource Management Systems and customer relationship management software solutions to large corporation. Founded in 1987 by Dave Duffield and Ken Morris, and headquartered in Pleasanton, California, PeopleSoft s roots began with an idea Duffield had about a Client-server (then a new concept) version of Integral s popular mainframe HRMS package. Once Integral declined development and released Duffield to pursue this endeavor on his own, PeopleSoft was born. In January 2005, however, PeopleSoft was acquired by the Oracle Corporation and ceased to be an independent company, although its products continue to be used by thousands of companies.

The software is modularity (programming) into specific components, including payroll, human resources, inventory, various accounting packages, and student enrollment. PeopleSoft is well known for its ability to be easily customized, or tailor-made, to fit the specific business needs of each client, while still being generic enough to meet corporate and governmental tracking requirements. Its detractors decry the frequent computer bug found in the system, which required patches and fixes. PeopleSoft — like most large software companies — spawned an industry-within-an-industry of PeopleSoft consulting, the implementation and maintenance of the product.

=Product design=

The whole software suite of PeopleSoft moved from the traditional client-server based design to World Wide Web-centric design, called PeopleSoft Internet Architecture(PIA). The end result was that all of a company s business functions could be accessed and run on a web client. A small number of security and system setup functions, though, still needed to be performed on a fat client machine. It successfully weathered architectural changes from client-server to the internet due to its innovative meta-Database design.

The architecture is built around PeopleSoft’s own PeopleTools technology. PeopleTools is a proprietary development platform created by PeopleSoft. This platform includes many different components a developer needs to create an application including a scripting language, user interface design tools, standard security structure, and batch processing tools. The benefit of creating their own development platform allowed PeopleSoft applications to run under many different operating systems and database platforms. Once mastered, the PeopleTools development platform allows for rapid development and deployment.

All of PeopleSoft’s modules (Human Resources, Supply Chain, Financials, CRM, etc.) are built with the PeopleTools technology. A benefit of the technology is that all the code which makes up a module can be customized to suit the owner’s business needs. However, this ease of customization has led to a many failed or ailing implementations of the PeopleSoft products due to over-customizations or poorly designed customizations.

Maintenance of Peoplesoft is something that has provided enough opportunities for India based offshore outsourcing companies to rely on. There are several of these companies that have strong peoplesoft capabilities and offer services at marginal cost of that of global service providers

=J.D. Edwards=

In 2003, PeopleSoft performed a friendly merger with smaller rival J.D. Edwards software. The rival with a similar product line provided strange synergy for the newly-combined company. J.D. Edwards products catered to small to mid-sized companies running a variety of hardware Platform (computing), including IBM AS400, Hewlett-Packard, UNIX, and Microsoft Windows, as well as various Database systems, like Oracle database, Microsoft SQL Server, and IBM DB2. In addition, PeopleSoft was then committed to supporting an old-style green screen application — the same application which drove Duffield to branch out and create PeopleSoft in the first place.

=Oracle Corporation=

Beginning in 2003, PeopleSoft battled with Oracle Corporation over control of the PeopleSoft company. In June 2003, Oracle made a United States dollar7 billion bid ($19.50/share) in a hostile corporate takeover attempt. In February 2004, Oracle increased their bid to approximately $9.4 billion ($26/share), a 33% increase; this offer was also rejected forthwith by PeopleSoft s board of directors. Later that month, the U.S. Department of Justice filed lawsuit to block Oracle, on the grounds that the acquisition would break anti-trust laws; however, in September 2004, the suit was rejected by a United States Federal judge, who found that the Justice Department had not proven its anti-trust case; in October, the same decision was handed down by the European Commission. Though Oracle had reduced its offer to $7.7 billion ($21/share) in May, it again raised its bid in November to $9.4 billion ($24/share), marking a 14% increase.

In December 2004, Oracle announced that it has signed a definitive merger agreement to acquire PeopleSoft for approximately $10.3 billion ($26.50/share). In January 2005, Oracle fired massive numbers of former PeopleSoft employees. Although these cuts affected about 9% of the 55,000 staff of the combined companies, they stated that they would maintain at least 90% of PeopleSoft s product development and support staff, at least for the time being.

= PeopleSoft in use =

PeopleSoft software has been successfully implemented by many of its customers. However, perhaps as the problem it attempts to solve is at once so very crucial and difficult, there have been situations leading to litigation. As with any ERP software, the implementation process (including analysis, planning and development), performance (load) testing and various other types of software testing is absolutely critical towards the success of the project.

In 1997, Cleveland State University licensed PeopleSoft s software for tracking student records. After seven years of difficulties, they sued PeopleSoft for $510 million, claiming breach of contract, fraud, negligence and four other counts. The university claimed that software developed by PeopleSoft was missing specified features, and as a result caused disruption to their admissions process. PeopleSoft claimed that they had followed industry best practices.

In December 1999, seven of the eight Big 10 Midwest universities which licensed PeopleSoft s software wrote a joint, open letter to the PeopleSoft CEO complaining about quality and performance issues.

In the winter of 2003, University of Massachusetts Amherst rolled out PeopleSoft s student records system, which was widely disparaged as clumsy and failed during the sign-up period in the Fall 2004 semester. The interface has since improved to address many of the student s concerns.

The California State University system adopted Peoplesoft in the early 2000s. Faculty, staff and students found its interface to be clunky, and it did not provide the functionality that was promised. The system spent $500 million on this system in a process so deficient that it result in an investigation and a rebuke by the state legislature.

Columbia University also began using it to track faculty and staff human resources records and allow self-service to update personal information and paystubs.

=External links=

*[http://www.peoplesoft.com/ PeopleSoft Website] *[http://www.oracle.com/ Oracle Website] *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4176571.stm Jobs go at Oracle after takeover - BBC News] *[http://irascibleprofessor.com/bigten.htm Open letter from the Big Ten to PeopleSoft]