ZeroOne |
=Category:Programming languages=
Hi, I was wondering why you removed Category:Programming languages from all lists of programming languages Yet you left Category:Esoteric programming languages in the List of esoteric programming languages article. Was that by mistake-) 12:42, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC) :Hi,ZeroOne. I decided not to touch the subcategories, since by their own nature, they give rise to lists of programming languages (say, the LISP subcategory -> list of Lisp-related prog langs, and so on). Perhaps we should make an attempt to standardize on the subcategory naming convention, though. The other possible way to use the Category/subcategory hierarchy would be to use the subcategories to actually hold the links to their languages, rather than the Prog Lang category; but this approach has many disadvantages IMO: languages could end up in both the category and subcategory, and there would be no equivalent to the current de facto alphabetical list produced by the category (in fact, if we stick to a consistent interpretation of the category elements, we don t need the List of Prog Langs in Alphabetical Order article any more). Furthermore, if a consensus is reached on how to use the subcategories, we might end up not needing the List of Categorical prog langs article either. One more thing... I did remove HQ9plus as a programming language, but left it as an esoteric one, on the grounds that since it is easier to come up with a valid new esoteric language than with a full-blown language entry, eventually we would end up with a Prog Langs category with an overwhelming majority of esoteric mini-langs over the real langs. Please let me know what you think. Have a good day. ::I think the main reason that we need lists of programming languages is because an article does not exist for each and every language yet. Thus the categories can t create automatic lists that would be complete. Neither can categories organize the languages in a chronological order etc. The problem of languages falling under their specific category and/or the main category is real, though. How would it be decided what languages should have their own sub categories Etc etc... Maybe we could even setup a new 20:51, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
= Programming languages wikiproject =
ZeroOne, what do you think about setting up the wikiproject ourselves Changing subjects: since you seem to be interested in esoteric prog langs, could you possibly verify that all those in the List of Esoteric Prog Langs are indeed categorized as: Category:Esoteric programming languages —
:You know what I just figured: 20:27, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
:Ok, you were too slow, I already checked all the languages for categories. ^_^ -- 22:50, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
:Can I bring up a list of revised non-esoteric prog langs in my defense 
Good job, ZeroOne. Cheers — 20:30, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
= NOTOC =
Sorry, ZeroOne. It was me: I was experimenting with the effects of not using a TOC on certain, rather short, articles and I forgot to remove it. Do you have an opinion or any thoughts on the matter — 20:27, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
:The article wasn t that sort as it did have four headers. I think a table of contents gives articles certain credibility, not to mention usability: with a small resolution (like 1024x768 or less) you don t necessarily see anything but the first header, if the chapters are long. Using the TOC you can quickly get to the chapter that s interesting and also see if there actually is anything interesting in the article without scrolling the screen. Also if more headers are added in the future the TOC becomes more important but people might forget to remove the NOTOC message. I can t really think any other use for NOTOC but alphabetic lists and such for which nice, short template TOCs exist. -- 20:36, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
:Thanks for your comments. They changed my mind by helping me put things in perspective (I use a 1600x1200 screen with anti-aliased small fonts). — 21:28, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
= Dr. Michael Krop High School =
Hello ZeroOne, I saw you improved the formatting of the table in this article. Could you please go to the DELETION votes page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Dr._Michael_M._Krop_High_School, and vote KEEP It has taken me many hours of work to improve the article, and some people still want to DELETE it (it s so difficult to build and so easy to destroy that it is sad...) Your help will be greatly appreciated.-- 20:49, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC) :Sure. Done. -- 21:43, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC) ::Thanks for your help! :) -- 21:52, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
= Civ series template =
Hi, I wonder about the construction of the Civilization template... the other category is what concerns me. I wonder if it could include other related games, and how related they would be. For example, Colonization. 17:16, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC) :I thought it would include games that have Civilization in their names but aren t made by Sid Meier. -- 17:22, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC) ::Makes sense, but that definition can easily get misinterpreted. For example, 03:15, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC) :::I now added a new heading, Other very similar games , and Colonization & Freeciv under that one. -- 12:32, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) :::: Awesome. 04:17, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
=Brainfork=
Hi ZeroOne. I edited the . Thanks,
-- 20:57, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC)
=The Humungous Image Tagging Project=
Hi. You ve helped with the :Hi, and thanks for the info. I ll start tagging the images rightaway. :) -- 16:08, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
= Article Licensing =
Hi, I ve Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the template into their user page, but there are other options at . The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
:Option 1 :I agree to all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below: : OR :Option 2 :I agree to , county, or city article as described below: :
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace with . If you only prefer using the
:I ve added a FAQ question dealing with the difference between the CC-by-SA 1.0 and CC-by-SA 2.0 licenses. 21:50, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
=Oops=
Your December 26 edit of 13:06, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) :What the... :O I swear I don t know where those tags came from! I wouldn t do anything like that myself, maybe it was a bug in Wikipedia or in Opera Wouldn t someone have fixed it sooner had the error been there Anyway... I can t prove that I didn t do it. I m deeply sorry if it really was because of something I did. -- 14:17, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) ::It looks like your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Unlambda&diff=9199356&oldid=8838391 browser is probably at fault] here, inserting smart quotes. Not a big deal, of course, but something to watch out for. 12:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
= =
Hi ZeroOne,
Great photo at . I d be happy to upload it there if you like; just let me know.
Thanks, 22:38, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for the tip. :) I created an account to Commons (even though I think there are already too many wiki-projects where each one requires a new account), uploaded the image and added it to 10:33, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC) ::Actually, there s the nebulous possibility for the Commons to become the basis of single sign-on , since all the other wiki-projects connect to it. Which would make life much nicer. 12:03, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
= Opeing move popularity =
Hi
Regarding which moves are poular and not, I have used [http://www.chesslive.de this database] and looked at the moves tab. Master games are overrepresented in the database, but not exclusive. 10:45, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
= Wikiproject Chess =
Hi again!
I ll sign on, but I will probably be stepping down my activity too the coming weeks. 06:06, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
= Template:Chess position =
Thanks for putting the board coordinates in the template. I had wondered if that could be done, and you just did it.
I wonder if we should have a second template that doesn t include the coords. If you look at Slav Defense, there s a large main diagram that looks great with the coordinates and many smaller diagrams that I think looked better packed tighter without coordinates.
What do you think -- 03:46, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:No problem. I actually wondered why no one had done it before. I think more templates would just make it confusing. People would use the no coords template with the main diagram and coords version with smaller diagrams anyway. But one thing I was thinking was to create a second template where there would be space for commentary under the board. It would just be a simple table where in the upper row you d have the board and in the lower one the text. Actually it could be done with the existing template by adding another parameter at the end! Leaving it empty, as it would be by default and as it now is, would only create an invisible row. How about that -- 10:12, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::If you can put in a optional caption parameter, it would be nice. Right now to put a caption under a diagram I think you have to put the chess position table inside another table. At least that s what I did in Slav Defense.
::On another note, I tried the 17:24, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
= Dis-ambiguation template =
I was told that the dis-ambiguation template should be a footer. You, however, appear to say it should be a header when I saw an edit of yoursin RC. Why 14:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
:I suppose you mean the edit I made in 14:36, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
= King s Knight s Gambit =
Hi, ZeroOne! I have merged your 09:58, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
:Oh, of course I m not upset. Good job. :) -- 23:05, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
= =
As you probably know already, the template you created () has been nominated for deletion at . I ve voted keep there, but I d like to know why you chose those languages. The nominator said that the 8 languages were arbitrarily chosen. I highly doubt this, and I d appreciate it if you could just leave a quick explanation about why those specific languages were chosen. I presume they are the most popular/famous ones
Please leave your response at 22:34, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:No, I failed to notice that! Thanks. They are mostly the canonical examples of 22:44, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Thanks for your response & vote :) We ll see whether the template stays or goes in 7 days. I know how much it would hurt to see your baby get deleted (happened to me once!), and I personally hope that it doesnt— I d find that template useful if I was interested in esoteric languages ;) - 22:59, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:::It ended up getting deleted. :( Discussion logged 3 July 2005 15:00 (UTC)
= =
I removed this listing you added because this same template recieve a consensus of keep on TFD less than two weeks ago. July 3, 2005 13:31 (UTC)
:Right. -- 3 July 2005 15:00 (UTC)
= Anthony Appleyard s GI images =
I was wondering, what program do you use to create your wonderful images, such as Image:Aps protei ida71 00.jpg Blender, maybe
I use Poser 4.0.3 . See http://www.renderosity.com for more information. 11:25, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
= Hitchhiker Templates =
You seem to have done a bit more editing with these than I have... 01:44, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
= Visual Basic Wikibook =
I see you have contributed to the Visual Basic article on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic -- 08:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
= Velho =
Thanks for the Finnish tip! It can t be a coincidence! 
On the other side, I was in Finland just some months ago and nobody told me that! :-O 03:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
= Thanks for the cursor! =
Thanks for the animated cursor at 19:54, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
:Glad you like it. :) Cheers, -- 17:07, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
= Hello =
Hi, I saw you in the ) 17:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)|
|