Techno-utopianism

Techno-utopianism is any ideology based on the belief that advanced science and Technology will eventually bring about ideal living conditions in the future.

=History of techno-utopianism=

==Techno-utopianism amid the dot-com rise and fall==

A movement of techno-utopianism began to flourish in the Dot-com culture of the 1990s, particularly in the West Coast of the United States. It was reflected in, reported on, and even actively promoted in the pages of Wired Magazine magazine, which was founded in San Francisco in 1993 and served for a number years as the bible of its adherents.

This form of techno-utopianism reflected a belief that technological change is revolutionizing human affairs, and that digital technology in particular - of which the Internet was but a modest harbinger - would increase personal freedom by freeing the individual from the rigid embrace of bureaucratic big government. Self-empowered knowledge workers would render traditional hierarchies redundant; digital communications would allow them to escape the modern city, an obsolete remnant of the industrial age .

Its adherents claim it transcends conventional Right-wing politics/Left-wing politics distinctions in politics by rendering politics obsolete. However, techno-utopianism primarily attracted adherents from the libertarian end of the political spectrum. Therefore, techno-utopians often have a distaste of government regulation and a belief in the superiority of the free market system. Prominent oracles of techno-utopianism included George Gilder and Kevin Kelly, an editor of Wired who also published several books.

During the 1990s dot-com boom, when the speculative bubble gave rise to claims that an era of permanent prosperity had arrived, techno-utopianism flourished, typically among the small percentage of the population who were employees of Internet startups and/or owned large quantities of high-tech stocks. With the subsequent crash, many of these dot com techno-utopians had to rein in some of their beliefs in the face of the clear return of traditional economic reality.

=Principles=

Bernard Gendron defines the four principles of Technological Utopians as follows:

#We are presently undergoing a (postindustrial) revolution in technology #In the postindustrial age, technological growth will be sustained (at least) #In the postindustrial age, technological growth will lead to the end of economic scarcity #The elimination of economic scarcity will lead to the elimination of every major social evil

=Criticism=

Critics of techno-utopianism, like libertarianism, point out that it tends to focus on government interference while underemphasizing the positive effects of corporate regulation. They also point out that it has little to say about the environmental impact of technology and that its ideas have little relevance for much of the rest of the world that are still relatively quite poor.

=See also=

*Neo-luddism *Singularitarianism *Technocratic movement *Technological singularity *Technorealism *Transhumanism *Utopian socialism *Techno-utopia

=References=

*Paulina Borsook (2000) Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp Through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech , PublicAffairs, ISBN 1891620789 *Bernard Gendron(1977) Technology and the Human Condition , St.Martin s Press, New York, ISBN 0312788908

=External links=

*[http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1996/07/borsook.html Borsook on Cyberselfishness in Mother Jones, 1996]